|
Post by Admin on Oct 20, 2005 6:13:13 GMT -5
|
|
star
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by star on Oct 20, 2005 6:43:00 GMT -5
the link doesn't work.
|
|
|
Post by andrea on Oct 20, 2005 12:28:09 GMT -5
what did it say glenny?
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 20, 2005 12:34:41 GMT -5
It was saying that the report from the cops had been submitted. the crown has 10 days. From personal experience Andrea , I say if the conditions are upheld, the next day or day after that she'll be arrestted. That will be the 10 days. the timing is perfect, a little to perfect.
|
|
star
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by star on Oct 20, 2005 12:59:26 GMT -5
i hope to god she's arrested and goes back to where she belongs, behind bars. it will only be for a little while but in that little while, there just might be a person or two (victims that have yet to get any justice) that comes out and charges her with rape. chances of that happening are pretty slim but, you never know.
|
|
star
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by star on Oct 24, 2005 10:10:24 GMT -5
Homolkato appeal release restrictions Monday CTV.ca News Staff
Notorious schoolgirl killer Karla Homolka will seek an appeal of her court-imposed restrictions Monday, arguing they violate her constitutional rights.
Quebec Superior Court Justice Jean Beaulieu imposed the restrictions when Homolka was released from prison on July 4, after serving 12 years for the killings of Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy.
Restrictions include not working in a position of authority over anyone younger than 16, and not communicating with the French and Mahaffy families. Homolka is also unable to consort with any violent offenders.
Homolka has already been investigated by Quebec police for allegedly breaking some of these restrictions. Last week, police submitted their report to the Crown.
The investigation was prompted by Homolka's former employer, Richer Lapointe, who told police she broke her release conditions shortly after leaving prison.
Lapointe formerly ran a hardware store in Longueuil, about a 10-minute drive from Montreal, where Homolka worked. He said he had employed Homolka as a clerk in hopes of helping her rehabilitate but recorded a number of their conversations to protect himself.
He shared these tapes with CTV News in August, before giving them to the police. Lapointe taped the conversations by hiding a recording device in a paint can.
He alleges the recordings indicate Homolka contacted violent criminals and was alone with two of his children.
Breaching those conditions can put Homolka back behind bars for up to two years.
When she seeks an appeal on her restrictions Monday, Homolka does not have to appear in court.
It's also unclear whether the victims' families will attend, although their lawyer, Tim Danson, is contesting the appeal.
Justice James Brunton of the Quebec Superior Court previously ruled that the families can argue against the appeal on "a very narrow basis."
Danson argued that only the victims' families can properly convey the horror of Homolka's crimes. Full story with video: sympaticomsn.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20051023/homolka_051023#
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 24, 2005 11:41:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by andrea on Oct 24, 2005 13:33:54 GMT -5
Hey, are they going to discuss her breach of restrictions in court today too? I saw a picture in Globe and Mail that showed Richer Lapointe going into the court room.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Oct 24, 2005 13:45:09 GMT -5
I don't think so since she hasn't been charged with breach. Who knows maybe lapointe is still trying to get laid.
|
|
|
Post by andrea on Oct 24, 2005 15:12:55 GMT -5
I just heard that the judge is going to decide on everything by Nov 3. More waiting. Quite frankly I wish it was all over one way or another.
|
|